Yeah .. It's true. Here at home in all the Pc's the link to the net and the network is via wireless. Finally, some might say modernices.
When a year ago I decided to invest in it got a SMC 2804 WBR (if memory serves me), and one PCMCIA SMC 2835. The PCMCIA has given what he had to give, and because it had to buy a new one. As a result of moving house, I adopted the criterion zero wires, also decided to buy a PCi for the PC.
After some market research, found some nice boards mark Zaap Chip7 at very cheap compared to Linksys, Dlinks and the like.
There he got the two, and later searching for linux drivers, quickly came to the conclusion that these were nothing more than boards Cnet, marketed under this label.
After more research, concludes that Cnet sold the cards based on a Ralink chipset, which even have drivers for them.
Anyway ... of course I started to use these drivers because they are far more developed than the primitives that ZAAPA joined.
Some time ago I saw a review in a bit, she spoke of said Cnet's, and really now proven.
For 54 Mbps cards are well below the expected transfer.
Do not pass 16 000 Kbps, or about 1.6 Mbps. ... but theoretically should give 54 Mbps, assuming I am doing a transfer on the Internal network with the server connected via RJ45 to 100 Mbps.
In short ... when the price is low distrusts the people, but ready, in terms of stability and problems are excellent and may well conclude that it has a good quality price.
But in fact, migrate everything to Linksys was a great idea.
Now was the time.
Firefox, default browser now for Windows, with the Ie relegated to the background.
The quality of this project is amazing.
Well ... Today was an eventful day.
I finally managed to wash two windows of the house ... after three months.
My girlfriend finished the undergraduate 
I decided a little bug in a script used in one place. ... The idea was just do a traceroute, which crashed the time. After a small parameter change was to solve. It may be that soon make available these small tools to the site.
At nightfall, and saw a friend of need "a sexy image of Christmas, I found this on google. Christmas? Yes ... but not bold! Lol
And yet another example ... But that benito
Wish good night 
Well yesterday there was a short power failure. Repairing the logs I see that it occurred by 7:45 am, after waking and recovered energy. Apparently the ADSL router was amazed, because we have not even recovered energy. When I got home by 22:30, the light timing was undaunted and serene off. Only after the reboot the router and regained sync everything always going.
Summarizing Ups ... One was interesting, but it follows that where there is no immediate maintenance, everything can fail.
IXX .. that irritation. Someone had turned off the water outside the house. ...
There are no more to play.
Again, powered by hcarvalho
SI brochure, section 3.1
The 11th CGPM (1960, Resolution 12) adopted a series of prefixes and prefix symbols to the form names and symbols of the decimal multiples and sub-multiples of SI units ranging from 1012 to 10-12. Prefixes for 10-15 and 10-18 Were added by the 12th CGPM (1964, Resolution 
, For 1015 and 1018 by the 15th CGPM (1975, Resolution 10), and for 1021, 1024, 10-21 and 10-24 by the 19th CGPM (1991, Resolution 4). Table 5 lists all approved prefixes and symbols.
These SI prefixes Strictly REFER to powers of 10. They Should Not Be Used To Indicate powers of 2 (for example, one kilobit Represents bits 1000 and not 1024 bits).
Table 5. SI prefixes
Factor Name Symbol
Factor Name Symbol
1024 yotta Y
1021 zetta Z
1018 exa E
1015 peta P
1012 tera T
109 gig G
106 mega M
103 kilo k
102 Hecto h
101 of deca
Deci d 10-1
10-2 centi c
10-3 milli m
10-6 micro μ
Nano n 10-9
Peak p 10-12
10-15 femto f
10-18 atto a
10-21 Zepto z
10-24 y Yocto
Yeah ... did not know, but Herland found this. Here's how I found interesting. For the common mortal does not seem to be very important, but I found interesting duties, especially in the areas of engineering.
Prefixes for Binary Multiples
In December 1998 the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), the leading international organization for worldwide Standardization in electrotechnology, approved the an IEC International Standard names and symbols for prefixes for binary multiples for use in the fields of data processing and data transmission. The prefixes are as follows:
---------------------------
Prefixes for binary multiples
---------------------------
Name Symbol Origin Derivation Factor
210 kibi Ki kilobinary: (210) 1 kilo: (103) 1
220 mebi Mi megabinary: (210) 2 mega: (103) 2
230 gibi Gi gigabinary: (210) 3 giga: (103) 3
240 tebi Ti terabinary: (210) 4 tera: (103) 4
250 pebi Pi petabinary: (210) 5 peta: (103) 5
260 exbi Hey exabinary: (210) 6 exa: (103) 6
---------------------------
Examples and comparisons with SI prefixes
One kibibit a bit Kibit = 210 = 1024 bit
One kilobit = 1 kbit = 1000 bit 103 bit
One Mebibyte 1 MiB = 220 B = 1,048,576 B
one megabyte 1 MB = 106 B = 1 million B
One gibibyte 1 GiB = 230 B = 1,073,741,824 B
one gigabyte 1 GB = 109 B = 1 billion B
---------------------------
You can see more here
Recent Comments