Blog Rollback, and things part 2
Carlos warned me after having reviewed the post " things "that was tricky to put a comment in my blog platform with Chrome.
As we have recently changed the template, I think that is so, so it was done "rollback" and returned to my previous theme (thus taking advantage of the blog again to make a little more sober, as if I liked the beginning of the previous theme, beginning to find the really radical).
Still on the comment Carlos (partly in the post, and complemented by email), and I think I expressed myself badly in the post in question, who said that "since in FCCN thing seems to be dead" I was referring to the website http : / / www.ip6.fccn.pt/ , and that tells me that the thing is far from dead in the field of IPv6, as expected, because it is the entity that is FCCN, thus I believe that the proper correction be relevant.
In the world of my IPv6 tunnel is already up will some day ... and I'm not yet able to carry out many tests. The fact that he made this joke in a machine with 2008 Server, or lead me to believe that due to the need to install a TAP project OpenVPN prevents me from doing any routing for the tunnel. In practice the machine in question can ping my gateway IPV6, and eventually drip ipv6.google.com through its IPv6 address. But the attempt to ping the name ipv6.google.com is not possible, unless it does so directly by IP (that I think are problems related to DNS).
C: \ Windows \ system32> ping ipv6.google.comPing request Could not find host ipv6.google.com. Please check the name and tryagain.C: \ Windows \ system32> nslookup ipv6.google.comServer: dsldevice.lanAddress: 10.0.0.138Non-authoritative answer:Name: ipv6.l.google.comAddresses: 2a00: 1450:8006:: 932a00: 1450:8006:: 682a00: 1450:8006:: 63Aliases: ipv6.google.comC: \ Windows \ system32> ping 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93Pinging 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 54msReply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 53msReply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 53msReply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 54msPing statistics for 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 53ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 53msC: \ Windows \ system32>
C: \ Windows \ system32> ping request ipv6.google.comPing Could not find host ipv6.google.com. Please check the name and tryagain.
C: \ Windows \ system32> nslookup ipv6.google.comServer: dsldevice.lanAddress: 10.0.0.138
Non-authoritative answer: Name: ipv6.l.google.comAddresses: 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93 2a00: 1450:8006:: 68 2a00: 1450:8006:: 63Aliases: ipv6.google.comC: \ Windows \ system32> ping 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93
Pinging 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 54msReply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 53msReply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 53msReply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 54ms
Ping statistics for 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 53ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 53ms
Try to open Google in Firefox was not possible until now by name, but if open the same via http:// [2a00: 1450:8006:: 93] / I can actually access.
Definitely wanted to somehow router traffic through here, but I think I'll use a Linux box to do some more testing when possible.
At the moment I want to keep the tunnel up, so that they can ask for in a subnet Sixx, and power play with a little more detail here at home. All my pcs Windows / Linux at home already use IPV6 so the idea is to put all this networking.
Obviously none of this is with intent to use the full time, since it seems that the latencies given the use of tunneling are frightening ![]()
From outside to my IP address using those "online pings" ( http://www.ipv6tools.org/ ):
Host: ipv6.durao.net
IP: 2001: B18: 2000: f7: 2
Success: 100%
Latency: 211.415ms
Using http://www.subnetonline.com:
IPv6 Ping Output:
PING ipv6.durao.net (cl-248.lis-01.pt.sixxs.net) 32 data bytes 40 bytes from cl-248.lis-01.pt.sixxs.net: icmp_seq = 0 ttl = 121 time = 70.4 ms 40 bytes from cl-248.lis-01.pt.sixxs.net: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 121 time = 68.9 ms 40 bytes from cl-248.lis-01.pt.sixxs.net: icmp_seq = 2 ttl = 121 time = 69.1 ms 40th bytes from cl-248.lis-01.pt.sixxs.net: icmp_seq = 3 ttl = 121 time = 69.2 ms Ipv6.durao.net --- ping statistics --- Transmitted packets 4, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms rtt min / avg / max / mdev = 68.911/69.418/70.402/0.608 ms, pipe 2
Finished!The machine that has the tunnel to Google:
Pinging 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 54ms
Reply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 53ms
Reply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 53ms
Reply from 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93: time = 53ms
Ping statistics for 2a00: 1450:8006:: 93:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 53ms, 54ms = Maximum, Average = 53ms
The machine that has the tunnel for the Local Host
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: hera.fccn.pt
Addresses: 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111
193 137 196 111
C: \ Windows \ system32> ping 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111
Pinging 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111: time = 11ms
Reply from 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111: time = 8ms
Reply from 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111: time = 8ms
Reply from 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111: time = 7ms
Ping statistics for 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 8ms
C: \ Windows \ system32> tracert 2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111
Tracing route to hera.fccn.pt [2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
August 1 ms 7 ms 7 ms gw-248.lis-01.pt.sixxs.net [2001: B18: 2000: f7:: 1]
February 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 2001: B18: 0:1000:: 1
July 3rd ms 8 ms 7 ms FCCN.IPv6.GigaPix.pt [2001:7 f8: a: 1:: 1]
April 8 ms * 8 ms ROUTER3.IPv6.GE.Lisboa.fccn.pt [2001:690:800:2:
3]
May 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms 2001:690: a00: 4020:: 2
June 7 ms 7 ms 9 ms 2001:690: a00: 4025:: 3
September 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms hera.fccn.pt [2001:690: a00: 1036:804:: 111]
Trace complete.
And a simple test to IIS running on the machine:
Checked port 80 on host / IP ipv6.durao.net ...Checked the port (80) is online / reachable!
Completed portscan in 0.1642 seconds
Are still two suggestions sent by Carlos (thanks again!): ipv6-tracker.fccn.pt and also www.6deploy.eu (strongly advise, especially e-learning tool!)
That's it ... enough is enough. And if someone asks what the hell I care about this, as I asked a colleague of mine, I would say that knowledge is important, and enjoy learning, especially in the IT world's.
Obviously I will not lose much time to explain my passion and love for these things to people who do not understand and want to understand how these exploratory activities are so interesting to me. I will not be sure that I will be able to enchant these worlds.
Like many love football and I do not, I like these things. Not everyone can like the same things but the world does not work for sure.
Big hug














Recent Comments